Home » Blog » A decided restlessness

A decided restlessness

 

 

 

The day of January 21 respond to a ne. That of the urgency to foment responses to the proliferation of the norms of the social Other and to the aggressiveness ! which signals th boomerang return on our practice and its (de)localization. Always on the ge. Extime . Product of capitalt society as much as power of unveiling of its semblances not allowing itself to be caught in the nets of its illusion of progress and productivity decid restlessness .

A political and ethical necessity, therefore, that th Question of School . That to say a theoretical and clinical necessity, since the analytic dcourse constitut only by the encounter with the reality of each one taken on a case-by-case bas, shaking up knowlge, dlodging certainty and forcing the analyst to reexamine h position.

To do th, a certain number of procures

were invent by Lacan to guarantee the restlessness of the practitioners who form the School that he found, th restlessness which the mark of th welcome given to the unique character of each subject, th restlessness  accurate clean numbers lt from frt database which consts in not closing th encounter on the type [1] , the same, the label or the diagnos! and requires a permanent adjustment.

But how to hold the thread and the action of a group of analysts gather around concepts! a corpus of texts, productions, the sum of techniques and strategies to reach the top  shar experiences!  and the solitude of the act and th permanent on-the-breach which that of the true clinic? And what the political action and the intervention in the city of the one who has reveal for himself and a few others h own semblances, the Analyst of the School.

not in the unon of a single voice

Th what you will read in the introductions of Jacques. Alain Miller and Chrtiane Alberti as in the return in the aftermath book your list  of three members. Of the guarantee commsion. That these dsonant voices insofar as they are carri by unique and singular paths nevertheless agree to find their tone in th same refusal of the “for all”! of the group illusion. And that it from “th base of operations”, from th “School of analysts” as Jacques-Alain Miller call them.

Scroll to Top