It was the analyst’s interpretation, “You give the Other substantial dishes” that was able to outwit the carnivorous Other with the big mouth made it possible . “getting eaten”, without a pleasure-seeking Other. Here, the weight of the body that is Un-pos . I wonder if I was going to become bitter about this mamma or rejoice in it differently? Make another use of this emptiness ? The lively discussion with colleagues highlight a new use of lightness with the body, which came to pierce this heaviness of the One enjoyment. Esthela Solano-Suarez argu that what is most real in the body is the hole. This last mutation allows a new dance with what does not fade away,
This society that sells ready-to-wear identity
bas on the easy universal releas by Jean-Claude Milner, is also the one that produces a new form of trauma. François Ansermet has thus highlight the emergence of the “priction trauma” to which science gives birth as soon phone number list as it anticipates a subject’s illness. A reversal of time, a roubl anxiety of a tomorrow that rhymes with disappearance, this trauma of a new type, which buries life and makes it the benefits of humility and repentance pass into the past in the blink of an eye, also bears witness to the mutations of identity in the master’s discourse, a shatter, jostl identity, in which the subject gets lost, and where psychoanalysis can clear a path for him, to find himself, in the present.
Another dream, a few years later, makes me meet
a belov woman, who with a wink tells me “You know, in any case, there is no sexual intercourse…”. It is the “You know” that strikes me, in the statement and the “in any case…”, as if she were emphasizing the fact that even wanting to love her, to join a “union without denial”, it will fail, and that, I know, in any case that book your list I try, I persist in wanting to make the sexual intercourse exist, with my romantic vein, in wanting to find the lost object. The search for the belov woman, beyond that of desire, sought to compensate for the present loss in the “hard desire to desire” as Lacan says, equivocating Paul Éluard’s verse. There will therefore be no “reunion”, nor a great evening of the reunion of the object.